Jump to content

The Gold Standard of Modern Journalism


Recommended Posts



Frankly, I don't care what kind of tattoos anybody has, and don't know why anyone else does either. Yes, even those gangster tears that indicate murder; if you want to deface yourself, by all means that's up to you. Nonetheless, here is another liberal tool bag willing to potentially destroy the life of an American hero why? I have no clue. Just to push a political agenda it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the New Yorker  actually issues an apology over the error.



The New Yorker issued an apology Monday that distanced itself from Lavin, according to the National Review.


“The New Yorker has just learned that a staff member erroneously made a derogatory assumption about ICE agent Justin Gaertner’s tattoo. The personal social-media accounts of staff members do not represent the magazine, and we in no way share the viewpoint expressed in this tweet,” a spokesperson said. “The tweet has been deleted, and we deeply regret any harm that this may have caused Mr. Gaertner.”




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...