Jump to content

rkbabang

Members
  • Content Count

    5,244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. I don't know about cannibals, but there is no need to hunt to find a pedophile. One was just sworn in as president. And what shred of proof do you that Biden is a pedophile? Spreading BS about the election is bad enough but slandering an individual with no proof is not very classy. However, if you have proof, so be it, but one might wonder why that has not gone to the court system. Just more QAnon foolishness? Proof? Just google search Biden touching child. There are videos and pictures of him inappropriately touching children all over the internet. Sure this isn't absolute
  2. I don't know about cannibals, but there is no need to hunt to find a pedophile. One was just sworn in as president. And what shred of proof do you that Biden is a pedophile? Spreading BS about the election is bad enough but slandering an individual with no proof is not very classy. However, if you have proof, so be it, but one might wonder why that has not gone to the court system. Just more QAnon foolishness? Proof? Just google search Biden touching child. There are videos and pictures of him inappropriately touching children all over the internet. Sure this isn't absolute
  3. I don't know about cannibals, but there is no need to hunt to find a pedophile. One was just sworn in as president. And what shred of proof do you that Biden is a pedophile? Spreading BS about the election is bad enough but slandering an individual with no proof is not very classy. However, if you have proof, so be it, but one might wonder why that has not gone to the court system. Just more QAnon foolishness? Proof? Just google search Biden touching child. There are videos and pictures of him inappropriately touching children all over the internet. Sure this isn't absolute
  4. I don't know about cannibals, but there is no need to hunt to find a pedophile. One was just sworn in as president.
  5. Better orange than old. LOL. Besides, it's his trademark, people wouldn't recognize him as a white guy. It'd be like the guys from ZZ Top shaving their beards. Or Dolly Parton getting a breast reduction. It's unthinkable.
  6. No ended wars, no pardons for Assange, Snowden, Manning or Ulbricht. These are things Orangeman could have done without Congress, but didn't. He lowered taxes a little and got rid of a few regulations, but not regulatory agencies. The swamp in DC is as deep and as dark as ever and is now about to get much worse. A lot of hot air, not much more. Extremely disappointing. The chances Biden will go against the Washington establishment and pardon Snowden and the others is just about nil, Biden is the Washington establishment. Trump had a chance to both do the right thing and give a big middle fing
  7. LOL, the US is more than $27T in debt and NOW you care about spending? At this point it is far too late to save. I'm just eating popcorn and watching it all come down.
  8. The riots were bad. But I don't think anyone will ever forget what happened at the Capitol. A whole different ball of wax. One was protests gone amok...rioting and looting. The other was an attack on the very foundations of American government...an attack on the Constitution. Big, big difference, except in the eyes of Trump supporters! But you guys think Trump's tan is real too! Cheers! Sure, sure, sure - just a little rioting - your rioters are better than ours...just "run amok" 30+ Killed 700+ Policemen injured (oh, yeah, they are racists anyway) thousands of small busines
  9. There are more troops in Washington DC for a new regime to take power than the empire has in Afghanistan. And the ruling class doesn't trust their own military. FBI screens U.S. troops for possible insider threats ahead of inauguration https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/military-inauguration-extremist-threat/2021/01/17/ed8885ba-593a-11eb-aaad-93988621dd28_story.html
  10. Sound logic from your libertarian perspective, and even more understandable in the light of the damage Trump has done to a lot of US institutions. I'm working on the new orange flag design now. So here's my summary of this thread so far. It would seem that although some people are a bit belligerent in making accusations regarding their fellow board members, no one actually came so far to propose renaming the country in Trump's honor. In a separate thread (Question for Trump Supporters Who Support the Overthrow of the US Government), no Trump supporter came up with a country that th
  11. Sound logic from your libertarian perspective, and even more understandable in the light of the damage Trump has done to a lot of US institutions. I'm working on the new orange flag design now.
  12. Come on? Like him or hate him, how do you not pick Trumpy McTrumpface as a name? It's really the perfect name, after all the federal government is more of a mess than even Trump himself.
  13. Too reductionist for my palate. Nihilism is just so boring. ;D His original argument is like retorting to someone critical of Stalin. "You don't like Stalin? You know who else didn't like Stalin? Hitler that's who!" It is just not a very good argument. Stating that they are more similar to me than different is just a fact. You don't have to enjoy it.
  14. I'm guessing North Korea, Russia and Saudi Arabia. AOC is not well liked in any of those countries. Cheers! There have been many religious sects throughout history that have fervently hated one another yet from the view of an atheist they are far more similar than they are different. The same with government cults. Stalin and Hitler hated each other for example. The fact that Kim Jong-un is not a fan of AOC is meaningless. From the anarchist point of view they are far more similar than different.
×
×
  • Create New...